首页> 外文OA文献 >In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
【2h】

In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.

机译:笔型激光荧光装置和咬合射线照相的体外性能,用于检测恒牙和乳牙的龋齿。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM\ud\udTo evaluate the performance of a pen‑type laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent 2190; LFpen, KaVo, Germany) and bitewing radiographs (BW) for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.\ud\udMATERIALS AND METHODS\ud\udA total of 246 anterior approximal surfaces (102 permanent and 144 primary) were selected. Contact points were simulated using sound teeth. Two examiners assessed all approximal surfaces using LFpen and BW. The teeth were histologically assessed for the reference standard. Optimal cut‑off limits were calculated for LFpen for primary and permanent teeth. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were calculated for D1 (enamel and dentin lesions) and D3 (dentin lesions) thresholds. The reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's weighted kappa values.\ud\udRESULTS\ud\udFor permanent teeth, the LFpen cut‑off were 0- 27 (sound), 28- 33 (enamel caries) and >33 (dentin caries). For primary teeth, the LFpen cut‑off were 0- 7 (sound), 8- 32 (enamelcaries) and >32 (dentin caries). The LFpen presented higher sensitivity values than BW for primary teeth (0.58 vs. 0.32 at D1 and 0.80 vs. 0.47 at D3) and permanent teeth (0.80 vs. 0.57 at D1 and 0.94 vs. 0.51 at D3). Specificity did not show a significant difference between the methods. Rank correlations with histology were 0.59 and 0.83 (LFpen) and 0.36 and 0.70 (BW) for primary and permanent teeth, respectively, considering all lesions. ICC values for LFpen were 0.71 (inter) and 0.86 (intra) for permanent teeth and 0.94 (inter) and 0.90/0.99 for primary teeth. Kappa values for BW were 0.69 (inter) and 0.68/0.90 (intra) for permanent teeth and 0.64 (inter) and 0.89/0.89 for primary teeth.\ud\udCONCLUSION\ud\udLFpen presented better reproducibility for primary and permanent teeth and higher accuracy in detecting caries lesions at D1 threshold than BW for permanent teeth. LFpen should be used as an adjunct method for approximal caries detection.
机译:AIM \ ud \ ud为评估笔型激光荧光仪(DIAGNOdent 2190; LFpen,KaVo,德国)和咬合射线照相(BW)的性能,以检测恒牙和乳牙中的龋齿。\ ud \ ud材料和方法\ ud \ ud总共选择了246个前表面(102个永久表面和144个主表面)。接触点是使用齿齿模拟的。两名检查员使用LFpen和BW评估了所有近似表面。对牙齿进行组织学评估以作为参考标准。计算了乳齿和恒齿的LFpen的最佳截止极限。计算D1(牙釉质和牙本质病变)和D3(牙质病变)阈值的灵敏度,特异性,准确性和受体工作特征曲线(Az)下的面积。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和科恩加权κ值评估可重复性。\ ud \ udRESULTS \ ud \ ud对于恒牙,LFpen截止值为0- 27(声音),28-33(搪瓷龋齿)和> 33(齿龋)。对于乳齿,LFpen截止值为0-7(声音),8-32(牙釉质)和> 32(牙质龋齿)。对于乳牙(D1为0.58 vs.0.32,D3为0.80 vs.0.47)和永久性牙齿(D1为0.80 vs.0.57和D3为0.94 vs.0.51),LFpen的灵敏度值高于BW。特异性在两种方法之间没有显着差异。考虑到所有病变,与乳牙的组织学等级相关性分别为0.59和0.83(LFpen),以及0.36和0.70(BW)。 LFpen的ICC值对于恒齿为0.71(中间)和0.86(内部),对于乳齿为0.94(中间)和0.90 / 0.99。恒牙的BW卡伯值分别为0.69(间)和0.68 / 0.90(内),乳牙的Kappa值分别为0.64(间)和0.89 / 0.89。\ ud \ ud结论\ ud \ udLFpen表现出更好的重现性对于永久性牙齿,在D1阈值处检测到的龋损比BW更准确。 LFpen应该用作辅助方法来检测龋齿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号